Matrix Of Ethical Theories Kantian Ethics Code Of Ethics
Nietzsche: Our moral concepts are not arbitrary, if we form them in the proper way.One of the broader deontological moral theories is Kant's theory, expounded in his book Foundations of the Metaphysics of Morals (Grundlegung zur Metaphysik. It is also available as an app.Kant: Duty-based Ethics Benefits of Kantian ethics: The Challenge from Prudence: Since we're meant to be more than just happy, the fact that our moral requirements will sometimes make us unhappy shouldn't bother us. 2 From Kants 1785 book Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals, with a variety.This document is designed as an introduction to thinking ethically. Moral Theories, Principles of Health Care Ethics, and Professional Ethics Codes Ethics is a branch of philosophy devoted to the study of morality.This study deals with the ethical implications and moral questions that. Describe the decision criteria and analyze each theory using examples and the Ethical Theory Matrix Template. Identify the professional code of ethics for your professional specialty or a specialty that interests you.
Kantian ethics is based on what Immanuel Kant claimed is the supreme.Simply stated, ethics refers to standards of behavior that tell us how human beings ought to act in the many situations in which they find themselves-as friends, parents, children, citizens, businesspeople, teachers, professionals, and so on.It is helpful to identify what ethics is NOT: Act utilitarianism (AU) is the moral theory that holds that the morally right. What is Ethics?Ethics-Based Remedy: Aims at mitigation rather than eradication and comprises the following: take ethics seriously, have a sound understanding of the applicable theories of ethics and be adept to linking actions to these theories, adapt to a shift of view of risk and ethics, carry out ethical analysis and be adept to applying the ethical. Ethics really has to do with all these levels - acting ethically as individuals, creating ethical organizations and governments, and making our society as a whole ethical in the way it treats everyone.
Most religions do advocate high ethical standards but sometimes do not address all the types of problems we face. Many people are not religious, but ethics applies to everyone. And often our feelings will tell us it is uncomfortable to do the right thing if it is hard. Some people have highly developed habits that make them feel bad when they do something wrong, but many people feel good even though they are doing something wrong. Feelings provide important information for our ethical choices.
Law may have a difficult time designing or enforcing standards in some important areas, and may be slow to address new problems. Law can be a function of power alone and designed to serve the interests of narrow groups. Law can become ethically corrupt, as some totalitarian regimes have made it. A good system of law does incorporate many ethical standards, but law can deviate from what is ethical.
But science alone does not tell us what we ought to do. Social and natural science can provide important data to help us make better ethical choices. "When in Rome, do as the Romans do" is not a satisfactory ethical standard. Some cultures are quite ethical, but others become corrupt -or blind to certain ethical concerns (as the United States was to slavery before the Civil War).
How do those standards get applied to specific situations we face?If our ethics are not based on feelings, religion, law, accepted social practice, or science, what are they based on? Many philosophers and ethicists have helped us answer this critical question. On what do we base our ethical standards? And just because something is scientifically or technologically possible, it may not be ethical to do it.Why Identifying Ethical Standards is HardThere are two fundamental problems in identifying the ethical standards we are to follow: But ethics provides reasons for how humans ought to act.
This approach starts from the belief that humans have a dignity based on their human nature per se or on their ability to choose freely what they do with their lives. The utilitarian approach deals with consequences it tries both to increase the good done and to reduce the harm done.Other philosophers and ethicists suggest that the ethical action is the one that best protects and respects the moral rights of those affected. Ethical warfare balances the good achieved in ending terrorism with the harm done to all parties through death, injuries, and destruction. The ethical corporate action, then, is the one that produces the greatest good and does the least harm for all who are affected - customers, employees, shareholders, the community, and the environment. Five Sources of Ethical StandardsSome ethicists emphasize that the ethical action is the one that provides the most good or does the least harm, or, to put it another way, produces the greatest balance of good over harm.
Today we use this idea to say that ethical actions treat all human beings equally-or if unequally, then fairly based on some standard that is defensible. Also, it is often said that rights imply duties - in particular, the duty to respect others' rights.Aristotle and other Greek philosophers have contributed the idea that all equals should be treated equally. The list of moral rights - including the rights to make one's own choices about what kind of life to lead, to be told the truth, not to be injured, to a degree of privacy, and so on - is widely debated some now argue that non-humans have rights, too.
When practiced regularly, the method becomes so familiar that we work through it automatically without consulting the specific steps.The more novel and difficult the ethical choice we face, the more we need to rely on discussion and dialogue with others about the dilemma. Having a method for ethical decision making is absolutely essential. Making DecisionsMaking good ethical decisions requires a trained sensitivity to ethical issues and a practiced method for exploring the ethical aspects of a decision and weighing the considerations that should impact our choice of a course of action.
0 kommentar(er)
